(no subject)

From: Majordomo (owner-re-online@it.uts.edu.au)
Date: Sat Jul 10 2004 - 13:22:04 EST


=09by marcie.it.uts.edu.au (PostfixFiltered) with ESMTP id C46BC261EA =09for <re-online@it.uts.edu.au>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 23:53:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk (grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.= 166.64])
=09by filter.it.uts.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324FD1D62A5 =09for <re-online@it.uts.edu.au>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 23:53:27 +1000 (EST) Received: from grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) =09by grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i62DrMQK0049= 78
=09for <re-online@it.uts.edu.au>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:53:22 +0100 (BST) Received: (from nobody@localhost)
=09by grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i62DrMuK004975 =09for re-online@it.uts.edu.au; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:53:22 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: grassmarket.ucs.ed.ac.uk: nobody set sender to ma= ssimo.felici@ed.ac.uk using -f
Received: from host4-246.pool21345.interbusiness.it (host4-246.pool21345.in= terbusiness.it [213.45.246.4])
=09by sms.ed.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP
=09for <s9900380@localhost>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:53:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1088776402.40e568d27c3cb@sms.ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:53:22 +0100
From: Massimo Felici <massimo.felici@ed.ac.uk> To: re-online@it.uts.edu.au
Subject: Re: [re-online] Metric for "good" RM&E Process References: <484534190@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <484534190@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D0.3 tagged_above=3D0.0 required=3D6.3  tests=3DJ_CHICKENPOX_21
X-Spam-Level:
Sender: owner-re-online@it.uts.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: re-online@it.uts.edu.au

Dear Stefan,

the following papers show some a case study using the RMI (Requirements Mat= urity
Index) and the refinement HRMI (Hystorical RMI).

Stuart Anderson, Massimo Felici, ``Quantitative Aspects of Requirements Evolution''. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2002, Oxford, Englan= d,
26-29th August 2002, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 27-32.

Stuart Anderson, Massimo Felici, ``Requirements Evolution: From Process to Product Oriented Management''. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Product Focused Software Profess Improvement, Profes 2001, Kaiserslautern, Germany, September 10-13, 2001, LNCS 2188, =A9 Copyright Springer-Verlag 2001, pp. 27-41.

Stuart Anderson, Massimo Felici, ``Controlling Requirements Evolution: An Avionics Case Study''. In F. Koornneef, M. van der Meulen (Eds.), Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, 19th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2= 000,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands, October 2000, Proceedings, LNCS 1943, =A9 Copyr= ight
Springer-Verlag 2000, pp. 361-370.

Stuart Anderson, Massimo Felici, ``Requirements Changes Risk/Cost Analyses:=  An
Avionics Case Study''. In Foresight and Precaution, M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harwe= y,
R.P. Pape, J. Tait (Eds.), Proceedings of ESREL 2000, SARS and SRA - Europe Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 15-17 May 2000, Volume 2, pp. 921-925.

The PDFs are available in my web page.

http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mfelici/

Kind Regards,

Massimo Felici


Massimo Felici

LFCS, School of Informatics
The University of Edinburgh
JCMB - KB, Mayfield Road
Edinburgh EH9 3JZ - UK

Tel: +44-131-650 5899 Fax: +44-131-6677 209 E-mail: massimo.felici@ed.ac.uk
URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mfelici/

Quoting Stefan Fichtinger <stefan.fichtinger@hood-group.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I am thinking about a metric for a RM&E process and also about a metric f=
or
> project, which is working with the defined RM&E process.
>
> This metric shall be used to give be information about the
> strength/weaknesses of the RM&E process itself and the efficiency of the
> project working with the process.
>
> Here are some of my questions concerning this item:
>
> Can we differ between metric for RM&E process and metric for project itse=
lf ?
>
> Do you have experience in dealing with such metric ?
>
> What was the measurand of a possible metric ? (e.g. No of requirements er=
rors
> found in SE phases / No of deviations from defined RM&E process ?)
>
> =A0
> Stefan=A0Fichtinger , HOOD-GROUP, Germany
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=

> To send a message to this mailing list send it to re-online@it.uts.edu.au=
=2E
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email majordomo@it.uts.edu.au with=
 the
> message `unsubscribe re-online' in the BODY of the mail.
>
>

To send a message to this mailing list send it to re-online@it.uts.edu.au. To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email majordomo@it.uts.edu.au with the message `unsubscribe re-online' in the BODY of the mail.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 09:00:19 EST