From: Andrew Gabb (agabb@tpgi.com.au)
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 14:24:17 EST
Another source of the Requirements Categorization paper is at
http://www1.tpgi.com.au/users/agabb/
[Regina, the link on the RWG page seems to be broken, both to the HTML and the PDF.]
Thanks Merlin.
Andrew
Merlin Dorfman wrote:
>>Jörg Dörr wrote:
>>
>>>Various types of NFRs are classified and treated differently in elicitation
>>>and documentation (e.g., task-related
>>>ones vs. system/subsystem related ones). Therefore, the NFRs are annotated
>>>in the Use Cases at different places,
>>>depending on their type.
>
>
>>I now try to avoid the use of 'non-functional requirements' because
>>the term is used very differently by many authors, and is inherently
>>unmeaningful, except in loose discussion. It is likely to lead to
>>omission of consideration of some types of requirements.
>
>
>>You might like to look at the INCOSE RWG paper 'Requirements
>>Categorization' at http://www.incose.org/rwg/ which discusses
>>categorisation in some detail.
>
>
> Andrew:
> Both the HTML (http://www.incose.org/rwg/01_req_categories\categories.html)
> and PDF (http://www.incose.org/rwg/01_req_categories\categories.pdf)
> versions of the Categorization paper "404." Can you check with
> Regina or the webmaster and see what the problem is?
> Thanks,
> Merlin
>
>
>
-- Andrew Gabb email: agabb@tpgi.com.au Adelaide, South Australia phone: +61 8 8342-1021, fax: +61 8 8269-3280 ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To send a message to this mailing list send it to re-online@it.uts.edu.au. To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email majordomo@it.uts.edu.au with the message `unsubscribe re-online' in the BODY of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 09:00:12 EST